<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Do You Write?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michelelee.net/2010/07/27/why-do-you-write/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michelelee.net/2010/07/27/why-do-you-write/</link>
	<description>Breathe: Words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:25:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Lee</title>
		<link>http://michelelee.net/2010/07/27/why-do-you-write/comment-page-1/#comment-6527</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelelee.net/blog/?p=2876#comment-6527</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how that would make you a hypocrite. I understand the staring at a screen thing. I hear that eInk is better for your eyes than backlit computer screens, but I couldn&#039;t tell you from experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how that would make you a hypocrite. I understand the staring at a screen thing. I hear that eInk is better for your eyes than backlit computer screens, but I couldn&#8217;t tell you from experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara Backer</title>
		<link>http://michelelee.net/2010/07/27/why-do-you-write/comment-page-1/#comment-6526</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara Backer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelelee.net/blog/?p=2876#comment-6526</guid>
		<description>Hi, Michele:

While I encourage e-book purchases because authors receive higher royalties and are more protected from the loss of royalties through used book purchases, I admit I don&#039;t own an e-reader myself for precisely the reasons you mentioned--the initial cost, and the soon-to-be-outdated technology--and one more:  I spend at least half my day in front of a computer and don&#039;t want to spend my pleasure reading time with my dry eyeballs facing another screen.
I guess that makes me a hypocrite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Michele:</p>
<p>While I encourage e-book purchases because authors receive higher royalties and are more protected from the loss of royalties through used book purchases, I admit I don&#8217;t own an e-reader myself for precisely the reasons you mentioned&#8211;the initial cost, and the soon-to-be-outdated technology&#8211;and one more:  I spend at least half my day in front of a computer and don&#8217;t want to spend my pleasure reading time with my dry eyeballs facing another screen.<br />
I guess that makes me a hypocrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Lee</title>
		<link>http://michelelee.net/2010/07/27/why-do-you-write/comment-page-1/#comment-6525</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelelee.net/blog/?p=2876#comment-6525</guid>
		<description>Well there are some misunderstandings about how publishing works too that might skew the degree to which it is failing. Such as I recently learned advances (I don&#039;t know if this is for all or just some publishers) are given based on the expected revenue for the book throughout its entire contract. Books aren&#039;t supposed to earn out at all. That does change my expectation that not earning out equals failure.

I also think that some of the issues are changes happening in the consumer, the market and society as a whole not just blatant failures on the part of publishers. I think people these days are moving toward a preference for long availability of products (backlists) rather than &quot;Hey this is new, buy now!&quot; I think most products are more permanent than they once were. I think that publishers offering low royalties on ebook and refusing to offer ebooks is a huge mistake, but so is the idea that ebooks are a gold mine that will replace print. For one many of us cannot afford ereaders, and even if we could the lack of standard formats and technology updating every few months makes us reluctant to spend that kind of money on something that will be obsolete in a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there are some misunderstandings about how publishing works too that might skew the degree to which it is failing. Such as I recently learned advances (I don&#8217;t know if this is for all or just some publishers) are given based on the expected revenue for the book throughout its entire contract. Books aren&#8217;t supposed to earn out at all. That does change my expectation that not earning out equals failure.</p>
<p>I also think that some of the issues are changes happening in the consumer, the market and society as a whole not just blatant failures on the part of publishers. I think people these days are moving toward a preference for long availability of products (backlists) rather than &#8220;Hey this is new, buy now!&#8221; I think most products are more permanent than they once were. I think that publishers offering low royalties on ebook and refusing to offer ebooks is a huge mistake, but so is the idea that ebooks are a gold mine that will replace print. For one many of us cannot afford ereaders, and even if we could the lack of standard formats and technology updating every few months makes us reluctant to spend that kind of money on something that will be obsolete in a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

