April 18

Review: Cinema of Shadows by Michael West

ISBN: 0983740208

At the risk of sounding too squee, let me preface with this: I absolutely loved this book. Over the last few years I’ve found myself increasingly bored with straight horror novels. Perhaps it’s my perceptions as a writer (picking out storytelling elements and good things gone cliché automatically instead of gleefully falling for them) or the by-the-numbers or just-like-Stephen-King styles that are prevalent. Regardless I find myself looking for something just plain different.

Cinema of Shadows isn’t actually different. It’s the tale of a group of college kids who are part of a paranormal investigations class (what college has that class? I want to go!) who are investigating the Woodfield Movie Palace. The Woodfield began as a live performance theater in the 20s, then a single theater movie place. Then it degraded into a porn theater before the last owner shot his fiance and himself in the ticket booth.

It goes without saying that the Woodfield is very, very haunted, and maliciously so. The kids are in for a world of trouble, especially since one of them is a natural channel, drawing trapped spirits to her for liberation.

In many ways, great ways, Cinema of Shadows is a typical horror novel. It’s clear West loves the genre, but also understands some of its failings. He manages make the book a ton of fun by playing on reader expectations and turning them over. The lead females can be in distress, without having to be saved and they can be saved without being weak and useless. Likewise the males can be tough guys, but still get into trouble and need a little help themselves.

Cinema of Shadows was fun to read, hard to put down though I had strong suspicions where it was going. Definitely recommended, especially by those who miss having a little fun and humor with their ghosts and gore.

Contains: sex, violence, language

Category: Personal | Comments Off on Review: Cinema of Shadows by Michael West
April 5

Review: An Occupation of Angels by Lavie Tidhar

Apex Book Company, 2010
ISBN: 978-0984553532
Available: Trade paperback and multiformat digital

Fast-paced and stylistically intense, An Occupation of Angels is pseudo-paranormal spy story set in a world where angels came to Earth, ending World War II. Killarney is a secret agent first assigned to assassinate an archangel, and then tasked with discovering who’s really behind the systematic slaying of the angels of the world. Could it be Nazis?

Tidhar’s style is urgent and wickedly ironic. There are a lot of spy stories with Nazi conspiracies, but this one is different from others that can be summed up in a similar way. Readers will wonder if Killarney herself is something different too, as they travel through her head in this world-spanning short novel. An Occupation of Angels is a great, vivid story perfect for libraries looking for something unique. It won’t be up every reader’s alley, but it’s a standout example of fantasy fiction.
Contains: violence

Category: monsterlibrarian | Comments Off on Review: An Occupation of Angels by Lavie Tidhar
April 5

Review: Dead Girl’s Blog by Donna Burgess

E-Volve Books, 2011
ASIN: B004OR1G8A
Available: Multiformat digital

With a plethora of both zombie fiction and self-published author samplers popping up, it’s often hard to cut through the chaff to get to the good stuff. Dead Girl’s Blog is the good stuff; two emotionally satisfying zombie tales that don’t have to resort to the weary format of plucky survivors getting picked off one at a time. Burgess’ characters stand off the page, reaching out and giving an often-missing soul to zombie stories.
There are only two short stories here, “Dead Girl’s Blog” and “Under a Blanket of Blue”. But it’s a perfect short read for those looking for a distraction in a waiting room, before bed, or on a car or plane trip. Highly recommended for quality and tasty pricing.

Contains: Language, sex, violence

Category: monsterlibrarian | Comments Off on Review: Dead Girl’s Blog by Donna Burgess
April 3

Astrid, Astrid, Astrid

So I’m having a bit of a dilemma and I need to get it out. First a confession: We bought Astrid. From a guy who had a sign in his yard. We didn’t ask to see the parents. We knew she’d had no real socialization and no vet care.

Let me explain. We’d been toying with somehow acquiring another dog for years, since we had some people staying with us with their dogs. When they left Dizzy got depressed. The kids are gone most of the day now, and I have a day job and Jason sleeps during the day (or is supposed to) so we know he gets lonely. He has no one to take care of during the day. But we weren’t sure it was fair. Would it feel like we were replacing him before he was even feeling old? So we held off.

Then when I started working at the kennel we debated adopting from one of the many of rescues that came in. When the job turned permanent we started kind of looking. As in “we’re not in a hurry, but hey, if there’s a dog out there for us, we’re open to finding it”. So for three months I played with dogs and scopped out rescue web sites and put out feelers. And I didn’t run into a single dog that “felt” like mine.

Until that guy brought Astrid out to see us. She wrapped her front paws around my arm, rested her head against me and sighed. It was storming, pretty dramatically, but I told her it was okay, so she was okay. And I fell for her completely, even if I knew she was going to pee in my house and chew on my shoes and I didn’t really know she was a Dane/Rott mix and her parents weren’t on site and yeah by buying her I was encouraging some dude to make a quick buck by breeding his bitch indiscriminately.

But my encounters with rescues were mixed too. Yeah, Astrid cost, but she was less than a lot of rescues charged. (One quoted me $300 for a 5 year old dog because it was a purebred and they knew they could get it. Most were in the $150+ range, some with application fees and a lengthy approval process that also gives them the right to come into your home at anytime to check things out. I get this is a safety precaution, and it’s sad that it’s needed, but I can’t agree to a situation where at any time someone can come into my home to pass judgement on me and remove a pet I’ve already invested time, love, training and money in.) And years ago I adopted a dog from the Humane Society. He was neutered and had his first round of shots, but also had several health problems from being kept at a shelter. The biggest was a complete inability to bond with a family. He never was “mine” therefore he never had reason to listen, or obey, or even stick around in the yard once he found a way out. (He literally chewed his way through the neighbor’s privacy fence.)

So no, I didn’t want to give a backyard breeder money, but I’d tried to do things the right way and here was my dog where I hadn’t wanted to find her. Yeah, so I’ve been a little mixed about this. But she’s healthy, she’s a good girl (when she’s not being a brat), and a few worms is all she ended up having, which the vet says about 90% of dogs have at some point. And I know she’s already attached to the family. She already knows to potty outside and we’re working on her telling s when she has to go. She knows sit too, and come here and we’re doing real well on leash training. Yeah, in week.

(Plus I can get into a lot more personal details about her than about my kids here on my blog, which is nice.)

Yesterday she had her first vet appointment. We were sure she was about as Rott as I am. We figured Dane/Lab. The vet says just lab. So since then I’ve been wondering, why am I so irritated at the breeder when I knew this was a likelihood? If I wasn’t hooked on a specific breed and I fell for personality alone and it doesn’t really matter, why am I so angry and feel like I was ripped off?

(And to be clear, I’m not convinced she’s not still a Dane/Lab because she’s grown a lot in the last week and it’s all been length and leg.)

It shouldn’t matter right, because there is no way I’d take her back even if we found out she was a poodle/yorkie. (Um, actually, I think yorkies are adorable. Plus at 9 pounds she’s already bigger than many yorkies.) So why am I so grumbly about it?

I dug up some pictures online. Here’s a Lab puppy at her age:

Here’s a Dane puppy:

Here’s a lab/Dane cross:

And here are a few shots of her (um, playing with her favorite toy–my work pants):

I know it doesn’t matter, and it’s hard to tell because she’s still a young puppy. But what do you think she looks like?