February 14

#storyeachnight Let’s Play White by Chesya Burke

Let’s Play White by Chesya Burke is an excellent collection of nameless myths, darkness and hope. Burke tugs readers through shadowy places where hope still tries to linger, even if the people have given up. She also takes us to places where light is strong and vibrant, but people can’t accept it. A wonderful collection, highly recommended, my favorites are the urban voodoo-themed ″Chocolate Park″ and the powerful rural fantasy novella ″The Teachings and Redemption of Ms. Fannie Lou Mason″.

Continue reading

Category: Personal | Comments Off on #storyeachnight Let’s Play White by Chesya Burke
January 22

Review: Zombie Writing! So You Want To Write About Zombies? edited by Armand Rosamilia

Writing Zombies! Is almost exactly like going to a horror con. Most of the pieces are conversational musings on how to or why the authors write zombie stories. Some try to be instructive, others are more enthusiastic conversations from fans, and most do a fair amount of self promotion (some more fluidly than others). However one has to wonder why we needed 44 authors to say mostly the same thing over and over and how, if many of the authors are new enough to still be dragging out the same most basic writing advice (and admit they only have been in the game for a few months, or a story or two) this book counts as being by ″Masters of the Zombie Genre″. I’m not saying these people have no right to write, or converse about their love of zombie tales, just that this book isn’t written by master writers, and a lot of it isn’t writing advice at all.

There are some excellent essays included here (Tim Waggoner, David Moody, David Dunwoody and Keith Gouveia’s all for sure.) But Writing Zombies! Desperately needs better editing on every level. The essays are too repetitive (to an eye-glazing level), there are profuse spelling and/or grammar errors included and even the formatting itself needs work.

If you’re a zombie fan and could spend hours sitting around talking about why you love zombies (and which ones you love) this is a good books for you. But it’s not what it’s billed as, valuable writing advice from Zombie writing masters.

*I live tweeted as I read this book. My essay-by-essay take is below the cut.

Continue reading

January 12

#Storyeachnight: Blood Fruit, edited by James EM Rasmussen

My friend Nicole Cushing does #storyeachnight on Twitter where she reads and reviews one tale from her vast collection of anthologies before bed every night. A few of us Horror Belles have joined in. I think it’s a neat way to read & review and I finished my first book tonight. Here’s the collected version:

Jan. 1- “The Lure of Dangerous Women” by Shanna Germain from Queered Press’s BloodFruit. Ocean-creature paranormal tales are very rare. This one was rich, well times, but a touch too short. I liked it, but I think expanded more it could have been amazing rather than just striking.

Jan 2- “A Different Kind of Monster” by TA Moore, also from BloodFruit from Queered Press. It’s a sexy, wicked tale that succeeds where a lot of horror/romance mixes as of late often fail. It reminded me a lot of Poppy Z. Brite.

Jan 3- ″Just Past Winter″ by Nathan Sims (Bloodfruit, Queered Press). Oooh! A Werewolf story! Interesting tale with a side that almost gets lost in some viciousness and m/m shape shifting sex scene. Not for everyone, but I liked it.

Jan 4- ″Hemophobia″ by Trent Roman (Bloodfruit, Queered Press). A hemophobic vampire tale this story tries to play with all kinds of stereotypes (sexuality & horror) but in the end it doesn’t escape the cliche. It’s not bad, but not standout.

Jan 5- ″The Diarist″ by Mark Silcox (Bloodfruit, Queered Press) is a queer ghost story with a classic-horror feel. In the end it seems like more time was spent on the setting and the characters and something’s missing in the pace/flow of the story itself.

Jan 6- ″After All″ by Laramie Dean (Bloodfruit, Queered Press) is one of the sweetest tales so far. Bitter sweet, but that’s how I like my ghost/zombie stories.

Jan 7- ″Happy Anniversary″ by Stephen Osborne (Bloodfruit, Queered Press), another ghost tale with a brief mention of facing the ghosts of the past. It has a real horror movie feel, which combined with its brevity makes it seem a little rushed.

Jan 8- ″Tombstone″ by Raymond Yeo (Bloodfruit, Queered Press), a neat little story about a superhero who is really a witch and his lover. This one is different from the others so far in how it handles the paranormal and GLBTQ theme. While I enjoy stories that use horror and the paranormal as metaphor for GLBTQ issues it’s nice to see a pulpy paranormal story that just happens to star a gay guy.

Jan 9- ″Captive Magic″ by Garry Mclaughlin (Bloodfruit, Queered Press). I also enjoyed this one, with its pseudo-Lovecraft feel and clever lead. It could have been a hard hitting moody piece, but the author went for satisfying and amusing instead. It works.

Jan 10- ″Hollow″ by Jamie Freeman (Bloodfruit, Queered Press). This is a real dark, real hard story to read because it puts reads directly into the mind of a sadistic rapist. Too disturbing for me to really like.

Jan 11- ″For Her Eyes″ by Quinn Smythwood (Bloodfruit, Queered Press). This one has a creepy gaslighting feel sure to put readers on edge without a single vampire, killer, werething or ghost to be had.

 

Category: Personal | Comments Off on #Storyeachnight: Blood Fruit, edited by James EM Rasmussen
January 5

Guys…

More than hundreds of rejections, more than the number of Twilight ripoffs getting published and going best seller more than anything else that I can think of bullshit like this makes me want to stop publishing.

It’s not the bad review. It’s not the angry comment from the author who should have kept her mouth shut (or vented verbally to a friend, rather than on a recorded media). It’s the mob mentality behind seven pages of readers thinking it’s okay, justified and actually in defense of the reviewer to attack the author.

There are three sides to this mess, the reviewer who knowingly posted a review that while not directly insulting was NOT polite. She had the right, I would never say she didn’t. But she also, if she wanted to avoid potential backlash, could have written it differently. I respect that she thought it was important to warn readers/buyers of her disappointment. I understand that feeling completely. It is never a good feeling to be excited about a book and be thoroughly disappointed with it.

The second side is the author who was COMPLETELY in the wrong by calling the reviewer names and COMPLETELY in the wrong by rallying her readers to dislike the reviews. Authors DO NOT do either, especially in written form. Seriously, that’s what bffs and spouses are for. Rant to them. And never, never indulge in the rating your books/positive reviews game. Ratings aren’t there for you as an author, they’re for readers/consumers.*

The third side is the anonymous public. You know, the seven pages of responses, many of which didn’t just give a supportive “I’m sorry that happened”, but instead devolved into nasty comments about the author then (as it always does) ended up encouraging others to join in with the crowd by returning the author’s ill-conceived nastiness a hundred fold.

Yeah, people, we know. Don’t fuck with people on the internet because they will say nasty things about you and flame you. Except, that doesn’t make them more right.

I have been in that situation, where I posted a negative review of a book I felt personally insulted by (I’ve done that a few times, and never without much consideration, usually a second opinion, and rewriting the review several times to make sure I was ready to stand behind every word.) And the writer did flip and personally insult me. It stung (probably as much as the review stung them.)

But I never, never want people to come to my defense by personally insulting the author or turning the thread into an insult fest/snarky comments via memes and gifs/using a single author to dismiss or insult an entire genre. Which is probably why the thread where it happened to me didn’t get to seven pages.

These kinds of things are not ONE person’s mistake, but a series of mistakes that people allow to feed on themselves and morph the nature of reviewers/writers into something else. So if any of you are my fans, my friends or my loved ones, feel free to dislike bad reviews of my work if you want, or send my sympathy if you feel I’ve been mistreated, or express disappointment. But don’t let yourselves be a mob.

This is why I’ve largely stopped reading and commenting on blogs. And this is what usually makes me wonder if I should give up now.

*I cannot honestly say that reviews aren’t for authors because authors are encouraged to get them, some are addressed to the authors directly and I love it when an author finds my reviews. I have even had some very positive interactions with authors who I’ve given negative reviews to, and honestly those people become auto-supports in my book.