This is about to be a very personal post. But some things are so important they have to be discussed.

If you’ve been reading here for any length of time you know that my son, codename: Mister, is autistic. He developed normally until about three then just…stopped. A few months before he started school his doctor saw a major sign called echolalia and referred him for testing. He started school, and the school, as well, referred him for testing. We got the school diagnosis back first, which was good because it meant we could get supports in place in school.

Transitions are a huge obstacle for many autistic kids and the shift from hanging out at home with me to spend the day in school with a bunch of people, noises, smells, rules and expectations was pretty jarring. But his kindergarten teacher told us outright she would do anything she could to help him do better. Teachers like that should be cloned. We need more of them, desperately, especially in the special needs classes.

In first grade we ran into a teacher who had no experience in autism, the school refused to allow her access to training classes (they just dumped Mister in with her), they refused to support her, and maybe, she knew he was smart and thought she’d be able to cure him some. I think it’s a rut a lot of people fall into, they expect (or hope) to be the one that makes Helen Keller speak. But it doesn’t work like that. And as the teacher learned, yelling louder doesn’t make a child understand.

With severe problems with language and communication Mister only had one way to express his frustration and stress, he got mad. He started throwing things in class, and cursing and yelling, and kicking and hitting people. The school responded by calling me multiple times a week and telling me to take him home. And so he learned that when he got stressed out or upset and hit someone or threw something they’d send him home, out of the situation that stressed him out. Bad behavior=removal from the situation causing stress. It was a VERY bad lesson for him to learn. It was a bad combination of events that led to a room full of experts sitting me down to tell me how horrible, how hopeless, how uncontrollable my son was. A counselor told us to just give up and putting him in a “place for people like him”. The school refused to educate him.

By the way, both things are very, very illegal here in Kentucky.

I broke down. He broke down. Neither one of us could get ready for school without crying. He regressed, going nonverbal for several weeks, refusing to leave the room I was in and wetting the bed at night (after none having done so for years). It was bad. We all felt broken and angry and helpless.

But school, like life, goes on. Mister moved to a self contained class, ten kids one teacher. It wasn’t perfect, but the teacher was awesome. Over the next year and half he restored Mister’s trust in schools and teachers. The bad news was that we had to focus on that, on fixing the behavior and anxiety that others in the school system had taught him. So he fell behind grade level (not unexpected).

As his teacher began pushing him Mister began stressing out again (to a lesser degree) and, being clever, he decided leaving the site stressing him out was the best way to avoid the stress. So he started running out of the classroom. Or acting out just enough that he was sent outside the class for calm down time (and as often happens in school, also got completely distracted from work). The teacher was great, but handling ten kids with special needs with no aides in the class meant Mister was often left to educational computer games because he was well behaved unless you were trying to push him to learn new things, and the other kids had more intensive needs.

So we had a behavioralist come in and evaluate the situation and concluded no matter how great the teacher was, and how much we all adored each other Mister was not going to make up for lost time without being in a class with better structure for pushing him educationally and still supporting his anxiety problems. People in the school system suggested another school. Remembering how he regressed after the first school switch we were very reluctant, but we visited it anyway. At the first meeting the teacher and ECE specialist pushed us to remove Mister from the diploma track. (In our school system you have 2 options–diploma track which means take all the tests, pass under the traditional rules and progress in grade level under the traditional rules, or the certificate track, meant for those kids unable to reach past a certain level of progression but who can still benefit from a school setting. No tests or such required.)

This displeased us, a lot. We decided the teacher’s quick decision for our son did not represent his best interests and asked for a different option. Don’t get me wrong, we’re not completely against taking him off the diploma track, but it seemed like a waste when he hadn’t even had a chance to bounce back academically from his first few years of school. We didn’t even know what he was capable of yet, so why make that choice now?

The school…was less than happy but did mention that there was a similar class to what we’d looked at…next door to the class Mister was currently in. Plus he already went into that class for reading and math. He already knew and liked the teacher. Why weren’t we given that option first? Your guess is as good as mine (probably the same as mine).

But Mister was moved to the class with two extra aides, with a behavioral plan and he started catching up. More than that, in the last two years he’s matured too, grown more secure, more able to calm himself and more able to face uncomfortable situations (like new math concepts and reading books).

Now allow me a small aside. We’re, in some ways, very lucky he’s gotten all the testing he has. For one, it helps us put to words what we already know. For two it allows us to back up our parent instincts with hard science. Every parent should be as lucky to see in hard numbers their child’s strength and weaknesses to address them.

Mister is a very smart boy. At his last evaluation his nonverbal IQ was over 110. The keyword there, though is nonverbal. Autism, while a spectrum disorder, is trademarked by an impairment in language and communication. There are other things too, like sensory issues, muscle development problems, and often OCD or mental retardation. But the core problem is one of language and social development. My OB told me my pregnancy was right out of the textbook. So is Mister’s form of autism.

He has no mental retardation, some sensory issues, no OCD or other comorbid disorders. He has very classic autism. His IQ is in the 110s, but according to the same testing he only understands 68% of what is communicated to him and can only express himself at about 78% of the kids his age. (We think it’s higher than that now, but that’s what the most recent study says, and those are the numbers I’m using.)

So any time you expect him to demonstrate academic principles through verbal answers, written answers or traditional tests he has problems, not because he doesn’t know the answer, but because he literally cannot understand the words, either in the questions or to form an answer. Given supports, like pictorial answer options, extra time to take tests, someone to write answers for him and alternative testing questions (you know how word problems try to be sneaky–he can’t handle that) he can do very well. Given behavioral supports like immediate rewards for accomplishments (like a high five), earned breaks for tackling harder work and a teacher who knows his signals and can help him identify when he’s becoming stressed out and help him calm down before he shuts down, he can tackle and learn. And furthermore, he can learn to have confidence in his own abilities, which in turn helps him take on new situations with less stress.

This year he moved from elementary school to middle school. The transition alone had us worried, but so did not knowing his new teacher. We only met her the week before school started, despite attempts. We keep all our reports and tried to share tips to better educate him. He had all the right things, an IEP, a BIP, in place. Furthermore we, the parents are far more educated about dealing with they system and push to stay informed of how things are going. For the first few month Mister did beautifully. He showed amazing maturity in transitioning to his new school. He pushed himself to try new work and function in a new setting. He made all As and Bs. He came home editing sentences, dividing and bragging about exponents.

We had a few small worries, like at a meeting the teacher said she worried about his lack of friends, complained that he was always talking under his breath (there’s that echolalia) and seemed very worried when we asked for him to be mainstreamed for Language Arts–not because of him, but because she didn’t want to give up one of her aides to sit in the class with him.

Then one day the bus rolled in front of our house and he didn’t get off. Jason, after a moment, went out to see what was going on. The bus driver couldn’t get him off the bus. Mister was hysterical, hitting himself and saying he wanted to die. It took us an hour to calm him down. When Jason called the teacher to see if anything had happened to upset him that day she informed us that Mister is ALWAYS like that, he’s always contrary and noncompliant and something must have happened on the bus. (The bus personnel were really worried, by the way, because they had never seen Mister so upset.)

Jason went to talk to the teacher directly two days later at which point he was told that Mister was lying about her at home because he was mad at her (Mister is not capable of lying outside of in an immediate situation. He will say “No, I didn’t hit my sister” but he won’t think to make up a story about something happened at school hours later. He just doesn’t think like that and has some problems with temporal concepts.) She then also said that Jason must be emotional abusive to him because he must be repeating the “I want to die” type talk from things Jason has told him.

To say we were upset would be a huge understatement.

Two weeks later (last week) I got a call telling me Mister was completely uncontrollable and could I please come help in the class. While I was there THREE people told me they never had any problems with him, they could get him to calm down no problem but he always seemed to have trouble in his class. One added that he’d been worried because Mister outright refused to go back into his class without me.

Is there any bigger red flag? Special needs child or not? Imagine the horror of finding out your child is so scared/worried/frustrated/anxious he cannot go back into his classroom without an adult he trusts there to protect him.

And while I was there there were no problems, he finished all his work. But his teacher claimed he said he was upset because his sister had started a fight with him that morning (which is impossible because she doesn’t get up until and hour after he leaves, not to mention he left that morning in a great mood). I held my tongue, though I dearly wanted not to.

Monday we had a meeting to address his behavior. What *should* have happened was a behavioral intervention plan should have been put in place to determine rewards, punishments and ensure consistent handling of problems. Instead five members of the school staff attempted to bully us into taking him off the diploma track.

He is incapable of functioning, they said. He’s too smart to be in the class he’s in and it’s our fault he’s doing bad because we left him in a class greatly below his level. (Do you see the same contradiction we did?)

The staff talked with each other behind our backs.

They ignored our claims that there is a communication problem, and instead insisted Mister just isn’t capable of graduating.

They denied that low language scores and anxiety issues were classic issues of autism and insisted “something else” must be wrong with him. They all claimed to have a great deal of experience with autistic kids, who are, apparently, either completely able to function in a classroom (which Mister never will be, they say) with no issues, or are so severely disabled they cannot possibly be expected to graduate. They were passive-aggressively doubtful when I quoted the IQ results and asked multiple times for me to show them the paperwork showing that.

They said there is no possible way they can educate Mister.

They said if he remained in his mainstream classes they would fail him.

They said they are a traditional school and Mister cannot function in their program, besides they are the second highest ranking (through test scores) school in the district and he cannot live up to that expectation.

They refused to talk about behavioral interventions. They refused to talk about supports in class. They said that in the class he was in they were not ever allowed to teach him above the 3rd grade level (um, since when are exponents 3rd grade level? Also we have since found out this is completely false.)

They said our only options were to remove him from the school or take him off the diploma track (no doubt for the sake of their precious test scores).

Jason and I left the meeting furious. I cannot count the number of laws they broke on one hand. Furthermore their bullying, passive-aggressive tactics proved they don’t care about actually educating my child, just getting the money his enrollment brings to the school. They blamed everyone but themselves for the situation, including Mini, who only one of them has met (and the other students)! They still refuse to address the fact that Mister is so stressed out about going to school, about being in that class, that he comes home in tears, he breaks down and just lays on the floor in class, he says he’d rather be sick or hurt in the hospital than go to school. They refuse to address the fact that the teacher appears to have no understanding of autism, and continues to complain about Mister’s tics (which are a sign of stress, NOT something he is doing to disobey her).

So we instituted our own reward system at home. He gets rewards at home for completing his school work. And he’s working again. He’s smiling again. He’s enjoying reading time again. He’s sitting down and doing homework again instead of being overwhelmed by stress. He’s found a reason to do his work, despite whatever is going on at school, and he’s beginning to feel good about himself again.

But today we got a note in his binder. The teacher complained that he kept talking all day (echolalia, it’s a stress response. He repeats to soothe himself with things he likes when in stressful situations. It’s like thinking happy thoughts only he experiences happy moments and yeah, that means he mutters things. It’s part of his clinical, professional, well established diagnosis.) She complained that he needed to be reminded to stay on task and do his work. (Tell me what 6th grader doesn’t!)

I decided to talk about this for a few reasons. First, because I needed to get all my thoughts out in words. Words make it solid and once it’s out in words I can let it go and look at things in a new way. Second, I know some of you know Mister and would like to know what the epic battle I’ve been talking about in reference to him has been. Third, I know I get hits from people out there parenting special needs kids, and I know it’s easy to trust people who seem to know what they’re talking about. It’s easy to not be as alert as you should be and find out things are happening. It’s easy to not know what your rights are, to think that because these people are educated professionals they know how to help your kids.

That doesn’t mean they will. No one can advocate for your child like you. No one can understand your child like you. No one can help your child like you.

I know Mister will be okay, because I’m already seeing a bounce back. I know he’s smart and I know I can motivate him, where others have to try to manipulate him or bully him. Furthermore I’m proud that he can’t be bullied or manipulated like that. And I know that Jason and I will walk in to our next meeting, lay our balls out on the table and get what’s right for our son.

But I’m upset that I have to. I’m mad that I have to make these people do what’s right for an eleven year old kid. I’m furious that I’ve been called a liar, my son has been called a liar and incompetent, my husband has been called emotionally abusing, my daughter has been called a troublemaker and the nine other kids in the class have been blamed by this teacher for bad behavior.

It should not come to this. Schools should not blatantly ignore the needs of the child and the help of the parents. The welfare of special needs kids should not be sacrificed for test scores. The system should not reward people for throwing innocents under the bus for their career. We should expect–and demand–more of them.

So please, please learn how to advocate for your child, whether they’re special needs or not. As your kids about what’s going on at school. Know what the signs of something being wrong are and don’t be afraid to say something.

Yeah, you might end up walking into a room full of people you know dislike you and want you out of their hair. But again, you aren’t just standing up for your child because this does NOT happen to one child. This pattern is systematic. They do it again because it has worked before. It has to stop with us, and if they refuse to make that choice we have to.

 

 

I know, I know, we’re all getting tired of it. But this entry is as much about preserving my thoughts (and some links) as anything else.

First, after Maggie Stiefvater made waves by claiming that real reviews are little academic papers the co-Head-and-Chief of MonsterLibrarian (who is a real, academic librarian with a degree working on continuing education) responded, comparing some of Stiefvater’s own reviews from “respected” sites.

I have to be honest, the ML heads (who are good friends and awesome people) and I were all pretty upset. They’re both educated librarians by trade. I’m not, but my mom and aunt were teachers, I was a volunteer librarian in school and I’m a former bookseller so books and reading have been a vital part of my life for as long as I can remember. But credentials aside ML’s goal is academic–to help librarians build their collections in the genres that mainstream publishing culture and education often overlooks.

We consider ourselves and our site at least semi-professional and try to conduct our interviews and reviews as such. But we’re also an all volunteer staff doing this in our spare time (which is why sometimes updates are slow). furthermore, Kirsten makes an excellent point in her review comparison, showing that many respected review venues often only give short blurbs of a review, most of which is plot summary. So “respected” comes from their circulation numbers and their name recognition.

Over on Dear Author there’s a good article that suggests the attempts to set “reviewer rules” is an attempt on the part of individuals to set rules of legitimacy–and therefore be able to disregard a reviewer opinion as illegitimate. (So in one sweep consoling oneself for a poor review and getting a stab back at the reviewer one feels insulted them.) This is a very, very good conclusion.

I’ve been thinking since I read it that it goes further than that. It used to be, not long ago, just a few years but that’s a life time in publishing time, that in the romance and horror community there was a lot of peer pressure to be blindly supportive of your fellow authors. To respect the effort they put into the work that was published with a good review or nothing.

This same idea spilled over (and still does) into the submission level, with people easily becoming furious at editors and agents for sending for rejections, or even personal rejections with no useful information. This rage has always existed. It just didn’t happen as publicly as it does not. I understand why someone wants feedback. It’s hard to come by, and even harder to get good (or even just useful) feedback.

But that’s not the job of the editor or agent (which is why it’s a gift when you do get it). It’s the job of critiquers, or peers.

Now there’s been a shift where a lot of the behind the scenes “work” of building a career is either more visual or skipped thanks to the ease of self publishing. Mostly, it’s skipped. There’s little drive to seek out opinions of peers when you can just throw the work on Amazon and get paid to get feedback. But the process of learning about what to expect as your career progresses is gone. That’s what “Putting in the work” meant five years ago. Not toiling until some imaginary clock dinged and your turn to be published came up. It was about learning what to expect and how to conduct yourself through your career.

So a lot of the people starting small presses and self publishing and seeing blooming careers with small presses and self publishing have never gone through this basic learning level. (Side Note: The better published you are the more likely it is that you’ve already learned this, or you have more layers–ie agent, experienced editor, experienced peers–between you and the public to help you learn/cushion you from this.) Which means that same beginning gaffs are more widely seen.

(What are those gaffs? Well there are plenty of other blogs about that, but in short it comes down to thinking you’re owed something. You know, owed a publication because you wrote the story, or a good review/reward because you submitted it enough to get it published. You aren’t owed a damn thing. If you want to publish you have to write a story someone wants to read. That’s the heart of how it works.)

So what used to be seen by editors and and agents is now seen by readers and reviewers. And, the kerfuffles recently involving reviews all come down to the art/product divide and human nature. We work, and want a pay off for that work. Nothing wrong in that. But artistic endeavors aren’t retail jobs. You can’t just show up, put in your assigned hours and get your paycheck. Artistic endeavors are skewed because the value of the product changes through a huge mess of conditions, one of which is the opinion of the consumer. (That would have been the opinion of the “gatekeeper” in the older model of publishing. so, perhaps we should consider that the “gatekeepers” didn’t just keep books from being published but also protected fragile artist egos from being shattered by the fickle consumer.)

The consumer will never be able to see how much work the writer puts into a book, mostly because that varies a lot as well. Some find it easy. Some toil for years. Some work hard to craft the best story they can. Some jump on a bandwagon or bang something out for a friend’s anthology. The ease of publishing works as an equalizer which means the person who spends two years writing a book, a year submitting it and a year waiting for it to come out is available along side the person who wrote a book in a month and formatted it through a meatgrinder.

And some books are never enjoyable even when the authors spends ten years on them, and others would have been great if they’d only gotten a someone to point out the huge plot hole in the middle.

But the belief of fair reward for fair effort (which is skewed as well based on the personality of the believer) demands that there be feedback, and ego wants it to be positive. So when it’s not it’s always, always hard to take. No one’s saying it’s not.  Mistakes hurt. But often times expecting the consumer to react positively to a poor story, poor editing or poor formatting is the biggest mistake.

On the consumer side I expect my burger at McDonalds to have the toppings I asked for on it and be warm and fresh. I expect the camera I buy to work. I expect the gas I buy to make my car move. I expect the books I buy to represent the author and publisher’s best work. I can accept a story doesn’t always work for me. I cannot accept that a professional’s best work is filled with editing and formatting errors., any more than I could accept a print books with pages misprinted or falling out. Enjoying the story comes down to taste more than anything. My fellow ML reviewers have certainly given positive reviews to books I found tired, cliche and boring to the point of being insulting. I admit I sometimes have really high expectations of books.

All reviews, even academic are opinions. That’s it. You, the writer, don’t need to insult, attack, or try to dismiss the legitimacy of a review/reviewer. Here’s a secret–the other consumers do it already. People dismiss one star and five star reviews all the time and buy anyway (or skip anyway). You don’t need to say a review doesn’t count. You don’t need to make up legitimacy rules for reviewers. You don’t need to respond at all to discount a review. You need to look at your sales, look at the people who did like the book, and furthermore look at your own feelings about the book and let that discount a negative review for you.

The truth is we don’t think we deserve feedback or sales. We think we deserve money, happiness, flattery and fame. We’ve been taught by Hollywood and the rich-get-richer culture that we deserve yes men and fame and fortune. That these things are OWED to us. Then that skews our own expectations and goals into demanding and expecting to receive things that are completely out of our control.

We cannot control whether we’ll hit it big or not. But we can control how clean our manuscripts are. How much we write, what we write about. We can control who we submit to. We can control our story quality by being educated about what readers like and don’t and practicing our craft regularly. We can control our expectations by educating ourselves on what is normal in the publishing field.

So in short, the key is to stop trying to micromanage the things beyond our control and refine those things we can control.

 

Writing Zombies! Is almost exactly like going to a horror con. Most of the pieces are conversational musings on how to or why the authors write zombie stories. Some try to be instructive, others are more enthusiastic conversations from fans, and most do a fair amount of self promotion (some more fluidly than others). However one has to wonder why we needed 44 authors to say mostly the same thing over and over and how, if many of the authors are new enough to still be dragging out the same most basic writing advice (and admit they only have been in the game for a few months, or a story or two) this book counts as being by ″Masters of the Zombie Genre″. I’m not saying these people have no right to write, or converse about their love of zombie tales, just that this book isn’t written by master writers, and a lot of it isn’t writing advice at all.

There are some excellent essays included here (Tim Waggoner, David Moody, David Dunwoody and Keith Gouveia’s all for sure.) But Writing Zombies! Desperately needs better editing on every level. The essays are too repetitive (to an eye-glazing level), there are profuse spelling and/or grammar errors included and even the formatting itself needs work.

If you’re a zombie fan and could spend hours sitting around talking about why you love zombies (and which ones you love) this is a good books for you. But it’s not what it’s billed as, valuable writing advice from Zombie writing masters.

*I live tweeted as I read this book. My essay-by-essay take is below the cut.

(more…)

Karen’s just starting to get her life back on track after the disappearance of her twin brother months ago. Until a strange voice on the phone tells her ″Two men have the carcass.″ When a man calls claiming to be her brother’s partner, both romantically and in a budding B&B in Fallen Trees, Washington Karen feels the overwhelming urge to travel to the small town in the middle of nowhere and retrace her brother’s last steps. But what she finds at the House of Fallen Trees is a classic creepy ghost tale that might have killed her brother.

House of Fallen Trees is a fast, compelling read. It’s dark, twisted and will have readers questioning Karen as much as the strange happenings the giant ship built in the middle of the woods. Creepy and fun it’s a stellar ghost tale in a thin market. A definite good choice for horror collections.

Contains: Sexual language, foul language

Andy is at rock bottom. He lives in his parents’ wine cellar, has no social life other than weekly support group meeting and appointments with a therapist who can’t be bothered to care. Worse, because he’s dead he has no rights to reclaim any semblance of a life. While it has threads of zombie apocalypse, Breathers is remarkably different because of its lead. First, Andy spends most of the book mute. Second, being an intelligent and overall nice guy it makes his journey to reclaim his life and deal with the seriously impairing injuries left behind by his death (including the mental ones and a few nasty revelations about his relationship with his parents, even before his death) means this zombie is an easy to relate to Everyman on a journey.

Breathers is a deeper read than your average zombie tale, but doesn’t forget its genre roots. Fun at times, terrifying at others and absolutely compelling. Highly recommended for public collections and an essential addition to modern zombie collections.

Contains: Sex, gore, language

I haven’t been meaning to do so much of it, but I’ve reconnected with an old friend that I lost touch with (and we’re turning out to be better friends than we were before), I found some old 3.5 in diskettes that I’ve been going through (in an ongoing attempt to declutter my life) and over on Reading Bites I’ve be rereading L.J. Smith’s Night World series. (You can read my musing reviews here.)

It’s that last thing that I’m musing about now. First, I’ve noticed some creepy, unintentional similarities to the Night World series and some of my unpublished work. Theme only, I promise, nothing close enough to be even close to plagiarism (especially considering when I wrote the work I hadn’t read LJ in years and, in fact, my books had been missing for about four years.) But it’s enough to make me think I might need to go back and refresh that book a bit before anyone else sees it. But that’s a decision for later since I’m in the middle of a project right now.

The second thing I’ve realized is that the Night World books are seriously diverse. While sometimes it’s in an expected way, like girls with black hair and green eyes and guys who are like big blond cats, in other ways it’s…well it makes me very happy.

Diversity in YA is an ongoing genre-political issue. There’s been cases of white washing, diversity only in its most cardboard form and issues of no diversity at all. Yet I’m four and half books in and I’ve run into not just African American and Asian and Hispanic characters, but the third book in the series, Spellbinder, includes Japanese and Hawaiian mythos and deities as well.

This has me wondering if LJ was the exception back in the early 90s when she first hit big. Or were we more inclusive of it then? Or is it just something we’re more aware of now? And does growing up with the LJ Smith-type books makes those of us who are reading and publishing professionals in our adult life more aware of it?

I don’t have any answers. But it is something I’m pleased to be thinking about.

My friend Nicole Cushing does #storyeachnight on Twitter where she reads and reviews one tale from her vast collection of anthologies before bed every night. A few of us Horror Belles have joined in. I think it’s a neat way to read & review and I finished my first book tonight. Here’s the collected version:

Jan. 1- “The Lure of Dangerous Women” by Shanna Germain from Queered Press’s BloodFruit. Ocean-creature paranormal tales are very rare. This one was rich, well times, but a touch too short. I liked it, but I think expanded more it could have been amazing rather than just striking.

Jan 2- “A Different Kind of Monster” by TA Moore, also from BloodFruit from Queered Press. It’s a sexy, wicked tale that succeeds where a lot of horror/romance mixes as of late often fail. It reminded me a lot of Poppy Z. Brite.

Jan 3- ″Just Past Winter″ by Nathan Sims (Bloodfruit, Queered Press). Oooh! A Werewolf story! Interesting tale with a side that almost gets lost in some viciousness and m/m shape shifting sex scene. Not for everyone, but I liked it.

Jan 4- ″Hemophobia″ by Trent Roman (Bloodfruit, Queered Press). A hemophobic vampire tale this story tries to play with all kinds of stereotypes (sexuality & horror) but in the end it doesn’t escape the cliche. It’s not bad, but not standout.

Jan 5- ″The Diarist″ by Mark Silcox (Bloodfruit, Queered Press) is a queer ghost story with a classic-horror feel. In the end it seems like more time was spent on the setting and the characters and something’s missing in the pace/flow of the story itself.

Jan 6- ″After All″ by Laramie Dean (Bloodfruit, Queered Press) is one of the sweetest tales so far. Bitter sweet, but that’s how I like my ghost/zombie stories.

Jan 7- ″Happy Anniversary″ by Stephen Osborne (Bloodfruit, Queered Press), another ghost tale with a brief mention of facing the ghosts of the past. It has a real horror movie feel, which combined with its brevity makes it seem a little rushed.

Jan 8- ″Tombstone″ by Raymond Yeo (Bloodfruit, Queered Press), a neat little story about a superhero who is really a witch and his lover. This one is different from the others so far in how it handles the paranormal and GLBTQ theme. While I enjoy stories that use horror and the paranormal as metaphor for GLBTQ issues it’s nice to see a pulpy paranormal story that just happens to star a gay guy.

Jan 9- ″Captive Magic″ by Garry Mclaughlin (Bloodfruit, Queered Press). I also enjoyed this one, with its pseudo-Lovecraft feel and clever lead. It could have been a hard hitting moody piece, but the author went for satisfying and amusing instead. It works.

Jan 10- ″Hollow″ by Jamie Freeman (Bloodfruit, Queered Press). This is a real dark, real hard story to read because it puts reads directly into the mind of a sadistic rapist. Too disturbing for me to really like.

Jan 11- ″For Her Eyes″ by Quinn Smythwood (Bloodfruit, Queered Press). This one has a creepy gaslighting feel sure to put readers on edge without a single vampire, killer, werething or ghost to be had.

 

I know I owe you all blogs, and I have the ideas to write them. But what I haven’t had is the drive. But let’s start at the beginning.

I spent my holidays working at a kennel/doggie day care. It was a fantastic job. I loved it, and the people I worked with too. You noticed the past tense, huh?

It was a seasonal job (yet another seasonal job I should say) and while there was some debate on them keeping me after the holidays in the end they didn’t have the hours to offer. So instead they transferred me to the grooming salon. So I still have a day job, and one I like, but there’s one huge difference that keeps hooking me.

In the kennel almost all my work was directly with the dogs and my coworkers. I didn’t deal with the “pet parents” much. So as long as the pets were safe and happy, and my coworkers were safe and able to do their jobs I was golden.

The salon is…it’s a salon. The people aren’t pet parents, they’re clients. We don’t sell on babysitting services, we sell on face to face customer service, like a people salon. In otherwords, they want me to work on building a client base of my own.

It’s not the only part of the job, because a lot of people come in once for a service then don’t come back for a lot of reasons (like they’re from out of town, or only needed a one time service anyway). But the core of a salon business is repeat customers, so the groomers and bathers (that’s me) are encouraged to make their service real personal.

So, um, this has exposed one of those uncomfortable little facts that you sometimes discover about yourself. Because my name and face will be directly related to my job I’m more anxious about it. Self confidence is something that I’ve been working on (I’ve always been a little lacking). Yeah 2011 was a wringer, but if it did anything it convinced me that I’m a hard working, decent person. I know I can do this job well, and I know I can relate well to other people. The first thing I get from people is usually how nice and friendly I am.

Of course inside I’m convinced I’m a farce and everyone will figure that sooner or later. But that doesn’t matter a lick to the people I work with or for. I know I can do this job, it’s that having my name on it, selling myself in a sense, makes me more nervous about relating to people.

How is that different from selling my writing? It’s not really. You do sell yourself as a personality when you’re an author. I’ve blogged before about how once you start publishing you stop being a normal person and you become a public person. Which is why you shouldn’t do things like complain about bad reviews or be nasty to fans, even when they are being bad/oblivious.

But I’m still at the point that outside of a few cons, a few short stories that come out then fade from the public eye and the odd blog post that gets picked up all over my face isn’t on my work or in the public eye often. Plus, the nature of writing is that even if it was, direct interaction with people would be limited to certain times, or filtered by online formats.

So it’s different writing something that comes out years afterwards, while behind a wall of email and Facebook that’s on a computer I can turn off and building a client list by directly interacting with customers in the flesh.

And, I do feel that way about writing, a little bit. There is nervousness that my next project is going to suck. That I’ll disappoint readers, or my publishers. Or that I won’t be able to hit deadlines once I have to.

So I’ve been facing up to the fact that I expect failure. I expect myself to fail, even if I do my best. And I’m trying to let that go. It’s not easy. But it has to be done.