October 13

I never considered myself a feminist

I’ve blogged before about how I never really realized the depth of neglect in my childhood until I was raising a child of my own. The same is true of me and feminism. I never considered myself a feminist, but how could I not be while I’m trying to raise my daughter.

I know she’s only seven, but we’ve already talked about how the way women in tv/movies/comics dress and how it affects them/her (“It’s okay for adults to wear what they want, but I think I should wear clothes that cover all the parts of me that other people shouldn’t touch.”), how she feels that girls aren’t supposed to like science fiction, and recently we’ve talked about women’s inequality.

I never meant to have these talks with her. But I refuse to skip a chance to talk about a deeper issue just because she’s seven. Or just because I’m uncomfortable with the topic, or I don’t really have answers to give her. It didn’t escape our notice that most of the people who criticized our Dear DC blog were male, and all the people who got outright nasty were male. What surprised me was that after the Ms. Magazine blog picked up the article she asked me what a feminist was.

I explained that feminist has come to mean a lot of things, but basically it’s a person, male or female, who fights for the right of women to be equal. This confused her. When I explained that there was a time when women weren’t allowed to vote, when they couldn’t own property, they couldn’t hold most jobs and often weren’t allowed to go to school after a certain age she was stunned. She’d never considered such a thing. I have a hard time trying to explain why this is, too.

Worse, we had the misfortune of experiencing that kind of sexism this year. I’m an avid role player, hard core table top and I met my partner at a LARP. Earlier this year I was part of a D&D game that I loved. Unfortunately one of the late-addition players has a problem with women. We came to an outright confrontation when I wouldn’t spend my experience the way he demanded that I do it, and furthermore when I played my character in a way he didn’t like.  (For those in the know, my elven fighter was made commander of a moderate amount of troops and he, as the player, demanded that I turn over the troop to his character’s control and became extremely agitated and augmentative when I chose to command my own troops. Pretty much everything I did that last game was met by arguing, yelling and physical agitation by him.)

The DM decided, rather than supporting my right to play my character my way to break up the problem by kicking me out of the game. That’s right, not the person causing the fights. Me, for not giving into him, I guess. I don’t know.  They didn’t even have the balls to tell me they were kicking me out, they said the game was over and then snuck off to play somewhere else.

Then a few months later the problem player expressly invited my partner to come play in a game he was running and made sure it was clear that I was not invited. Here’s the kicker, there are two other women in the circle of friends who are tolerated to “hang out” (but aren’t allowed to role play) but they don’t talk much and they certainly never disagree with said jerk.

I admit my feelings were hurt. This was not a new set of friends. They were people who had lived with us at time after losing their homes. People I bought food for. People I supported at times with money, but mostly emotionally and with help like rides places, research, lend resources, etc. For years we got along fine.

This hasn’t escaped my daughter’s notice, especially since on these game days even she and her brother are welcome to go play with the other kids, but somehow I’m not welcome.

So she asked, and now she knows that yes, there are still people out there who think women don’t deserve to be equal. I’m not talking about the unconscious skewing of society to oh, de-criminalize domestic violence because the perception is that it’s a female crime. Or the habit of people to blame the victim when it comes to rape but not for male-on-male assault, or even, say gang violence or murder. Or the sexualization of women in media, but not men. (Or at least, certainly not to the same degree. There certainly is a fictional image of perfection present in males in media, but it’s skewed more toward strength and confidence and perfection of moral character–either toward good or evil–not sexualized.)

So now it’s hard not to see it, even for her. and once you see it it’s ridiculous for me not to tell her that just because some people fall for the B.S., just because some people outright buy into it, doesn’t mean she has to be let them make her less of a person. It doesn’t make her opinion, her voice, invalid. It’s jsut so important to me that she know that, and if that makes me a feminist, so be it.

October 10

The Gutters

A poster on the Dear DC post pointed me to webcomic The Gutters where I’ve been comic-ed. I’m so tickled by this, even though it was clear the poster (who is not the artist) hadn’t read my post. I actually think the artist made a good point. An opinion is just an opinion. The only thing I’m truly disappointed with is DC’s response, which equated to “We don’t care you aren’t the customer we want” (and that’s what I think the comic was saying).

Let me explain why this is disappointing. Regulars here know I used to work for Borders. Their biggest problem was that booksellers tried to tell the company how to reach customers and the company routinely ignored them. Instead, the company came up with a number of schemes, including regional managers who routinely yelled at and threatened managers in their desperation. Managers meanwhile punished people who couldn’t get the failing customer base to buy the $20 loyalty card (to a business trading penny stocks who had been posting record losses for two years) at 50 or more people a day.

Borders didn’t want to meet the customers on their own terms, to meet the needs of the customers as they are. They wanted to force customers back into the mid 90s heydays. They wanted to force customers to buy whatever crap was on the shelves, not put stuff on the shelves that customers wanted. This is not a business model that can survive these days.

This is exactly what I feel DC is doing. They say they’re trying to improve their customer base, but they can’t if they aren’t willing to meet who their customers really are. It’s a business model that ends with good people getting laid off from a job they love because the uppers just can’t be bothered to listen.

So yeah, a little personal and a little disappointing.

But I also wanted to note, when it comes to the argument that my daughter shouldn’t have been reading a teen comic in the first place, DC defines “T” as 12 & up. According to state testing my daughter is reading at a 11-12 yr old level. Furthermore her teacher, her librarian and her dad and I feel she’s at a maturity level to read materials at a preteen level as well. She reads lots of other books aimed for 9-14 yr olds (she’s on a Goosebumps kick as of late, which is rated for 9-12 yr olds). Think the point here isn’t that I shouldn’t be letting my daughter read a “T” rated comics, but DC needs to rate comics with blatant violence, psychotic characters and clear adult content higher than for 12 yr olds.

Anyway, the comic tickles me. DC not listening irritates me and the world moves on.

September 18

I’m so tired of the writer/reviewer divide.

Over at The Book Pushers they’re talking about writers and reviewers. The post author found a rant about rating books on Goodreads. Among other things the ranter said:

1. Positive reviews are okay but never rate books on GoodReads unless it’s 5 stars, even if you didn’t like it that much.

2. Authors are liars.

3. Authors hate GoodReads. And never go there. Except when they do. In which case they get angry.

4. Bad reviews=lack of word of mouth=lack of sales.

5. Even if you rate a book 4 stars authors will look at your profile, see what your average is on books then get mad if you don’t like their book above the average. Then they’ll go through all your books to see which ones you liked at 5 stars and sit around wondering why you liked those and not theirs.

6. If you ever want to be published you should never rate books on GoodReads.

Which earns a great big gigantic WTF from me.

My GoodReads star average is 3.81, which translates to most of the books I read being closer to “I really liked it” than “I liked it”. But for this author that isn’t good enough. Clearly it’s 5 or star or nothing. Sorry babe, but you just aren’t that special. But don’t take it personal, most people aren’t that special because I reserve my 4 stars for books that I think should be required reading. Most books don’t get there. Even the really good fun ones that I recommend to everyone.

And I know a lot of authors who are active on GoodReads, because I know a lot of authors who read period and love sharing the books they adored. They like hosting giveaways, putting up samples, and very rarely do they read (or admit to reading) review of their books. I sometimes go and like all the reviews of my book, without reading them. Heck, sometimes I read them, like last week when I was redoing my website and looking for a small handful of blurbs to accompany certain book pages.

But most authors I know also know reviews are opinions, and they have little to do with us and everything to do with the person writing them. If you can’t stay like steel you don’t read them. Period. You don’t troll reader sites looking for reasons to hate people or be angry.

Plus, bad reviews do not equal lack of sales. Bad reviews can and do sell books. Bad reviews are word of mouth. No reviews = no word of mouth. Apathy is a far worse thing than people hating your work.

I have to ask, what author has the time to dig through the other books a reader has liked or not and compare their own book to it? Who does that? Shouldn’t you, I don’t know, be writing? Or hanging out with your family? Or hell, playing Farmville is more productive and more fun. So why waste time on that? and the truth is, people don’t. Some people might, but the big people, the majority of people, even authorly people just don’t give a flying fuck.

You win some, you lose some. No one likes your book universally and if all you’re getting is 5 star reviews then people are blowing smoke up your ass and don’t care enough to give you an honest opinion. If you don’t get honest feedback you can’t push yourself and GET BETTER.

Finally, Stacia Kane had a point when she blogged about this and pointed out that you have to be careful because once you become established as either a writer or reviewer people start taking your opinion differently. They add more weight to it.

Also, once you’re published you never know where your work will end up. Editors and agents will ask for blurbs and reviews on your behalf, and yeah, it’s human nature that if you’ve trashed a few authors in your travels they might not want to spend their time trying to help sell your book. (By the way the same is true of booksellers and your fellow readers. Spend all your time snarking about them, or being rude and the next time someone asked them about a book they just might say “I haven’t heard of it” or “I didn’t like it/heard it wasn’t great” instead of gushing about it.)

You do have to think about what you’re doing and consider if running a snark blog is worth generating some ill will. Whether you believe in that bad review completely or whether you’re just being petty, or clever. Whether you’re willing to take the fallout if people take your opinion wrong, or it pisses them off, or whether there are better places to vent.

You absolutely can be a reviewer and a writer. Many people have done it. Pick up a copy of Publishers Weekly and thumb to the reviews and look at their list of reviewers. Many of the reviewers over at Monster Librarian are authors too.

It can happen, if it’s something you keep professional and something you consider the ramifications of before hand. Most authors just don’t have the time to do both. Or the desire.

But be careful in implying one cannot be the other, because it’s very close to saying that author shouldn’t be readers and I can think of no better way to kill the art of writing than that.

 

 

Category: Business, My Work | Comments Off on I’m so tired of the writer/reviewer divide.
September 16

More on “straightwashing” YA

The YAY/Gay story I posted earlier this week has a rebuttal. The agent in question claims the edits had nothing to do with the sexuality of the character, but was about the quality of the book itself. At this point because no one can come out and show any hard proof, either because it doesn’t exist or because it would be impossible to release without releasing the book as well for inspection by the reader (at which point I’m sure everyone would have an opinion as well on the quality of the work that would different and thus feed the drama).

This is what I want to do though. Below is a breakdown of my publications and where they fit on the white/POC and gay/straight/other scale.

Wolf Heart, Violet Ivy Press, 2012-  2 separate secondary characters in mixed race relationships

What Was Once a Man, Horror Library volume 4, October 2010- Major male gay character

Meat World, Dark Futures: Tales of Dystopian SF – Gay male main character, love interest is Hispanic

Silver Veins, Expanded HorizonsFebruary 2010 – Autistic main character

Men in the Moon, 9 (Ennea) Issue #505 (Greece) – Sexuality not at all part of plot, but for the record lead is a hetero white male, antagonist is a made up SF minority

Rot, Skullvines Press, August 2009- Vital gay secondary character

DienerAoife’s KissSeptember 2009- white male lead

Hacked, 9 (fiction magazine accompanying Eleftherotypia newspaper in Greece), #416 July 30, 2008- white male lead

Scarecrow (reprint), Pseudopod.org, August 15, 2008- Gay male lead with a Hispanic lover and their sexuality is a vital part of the story

CarnivorousBlack Ink Horror XXX, December 2008- lesbian leads

American Idolatry, Nocturnal Ooze, June/July 2007 (now available atAnthologyBuilder)- white female lead

MoodooFrom the Asylum, October 2007- white child lead

Bloodwalker, Read by Dawn volume 1, April 2006- straight female lead of questionable race

Published Stories: 13   Stories with GLBTQ Leads: 4  Stories with GLBTQ characters vital to the story: 5

Stories with POC leads: 0   Stories with POC characters vital to the story: 2 Stories with Disabled leads: 1

Stories with minority characters of note: 8   Stories with no minority character of note: 5

*I did not count vampires or shape shifters are other races despite that being a theme to my BloodWalker stories. However I did count the antagonists in Men in the Moon as minorities because they had genetically altered themselves to reflect who/what they identify as.

So in short, I’ve never had more of a problem selling a minority-character story than problems selling a story period. I’m not going to say my experience is typical because there is no typical experience when it comes to a writing career.

Category: Business, My Work | Comments Off on More on “straightwashing” YA