September 24

Dear DC Comics,

*Just a note. Thanks for the link to Felica Day and io9.com and everyone else. I’m stunned by the response. Also I’m approving comments as I can and will approve any comment that isn’t spam or hateful.threatening or outright insulting of myself, my daughter or any commentor here. I adhere to the John Scalzi commenting policy. Please feel free to disagree with our opinion, because that’s what reader feedback is all about. And thanks!

 

I’m not going to rant like Comics Alliance (though you need to read it), or this one by Andrew Wheeler (also an excellent read), Ms. Snarky says it really well too (Go, read, DC editors. Take notes.)

Instead I’m going to hand over my forum and let someone else speak for me. Pay attention, DC. This is my 7 year old daughter.

And for good measure this is my 7 year old daughter as she falls asleep most nights, reading.

They’re both your books, DC. And furthermore she bought them both with HER money. Her allowance, her birthday and Christmas money. She gets at least one graphic novel and one book for major holidays. She buys superhero movies (we’ve managed to see all the major releases this year except Green Lantern and she’s loved them all.) She has a full-sized cardboard cut out of Spiderman guarding her bookshelf.

Most importantly? Starfire is her favorite hero.

So today I showed her your rebooted Catwoman and Starfire. She is not happy with you DC.

“Why do you like Starfire?”

“She’s like me. She’s an alien new to the planet and maybe she doesn’t always say the right thing, or know the right thing to do. But she’s a good friend, and she helps people. She’s strong enough to fight the bad guys, even when they hurt her. Even her sister tried to kill her, but Starfire still fights for the good side. And she helps the other heroes, like Superboy and Robin and Raven.

“She’s smart too. And sometimes she gets mad, but that’s okay because it’s okay to get mad when people are being mean. And she’s pretty.”

“What do you think about her costume?” (Referring to the outfit on the right)

“Well, she’s a grown up in that picture, not like in the Teen Titans cartoon, so if you’re a grown up and you want to wear something like that you can. It’s okay.”

“Tell me about that Starfire.”

“That’s where she’s starting the Teen Titans again. She’s helping the kids learn how to use their power and not be as sad because their friends died. She even protects them from grownups who want to tell them what to do.”

“Does that outfit make her pretty?”

“Well, no. It shows lots of her boobs though.”

“What does make her pretty?”

“Her long, pretty hair.”

“What about this Starfire? What do you think about her?” (Referring to image on the left from DC’s reboot Red Hood and the Outsiders)

“I can see almost all of her boobs.”

“And?”

“Well she is on the beach in her bikini. But…”

“But?”

“But, she’s not relaxing or swimming. She’s just posing a lot.” *my daughter appears uncomfortable*

“Anything else?”

“Well, she’s not fighting anyone. And not talking to anyone really. She’s just almost naked and posing.”

“Do you think this Starfire is a good hero?”

“Not really.”

“Do you think the Starfire from the Teen Titans cartoon is a good role model?”

*immediately* “Oh yes. She’s a great role model. She tells people they can be good friends and super powerful and fight for good.”

“Do you think the Starfire in the Teen Titans comic book is a good role model?”

“Yes, too. She’s still a good guy. Pretty, but she’s helping others all the time and saving people.”

“What about this new Starfire?”

“No, I don’t think so.”

“Why not?”

“Because she’s not doing anything.”

“Is this new Starfire someone you’d want to be when you grow up?”

*she gets uncomfortable again*”Not really. I mean, grown ups can wear what they want, but…she’s not doing anything but wearing a tiny bikini to get attention.”

“So, you know I’m going to put this on my blog right? (she nods) Is there anything else you want to say?”

“I want her to be a hero, fighting things and be strong and helping people.”

“Why’s that?”

“Because she’s what inspires me to be good.”

See, it’s not about what they’re wearing, though that can influence things. What makes a hero is WHO they are, the choices they make and the things they do. If my 7 year old can tell what you’ve done from looking at the pictures (there is no way I’m going to let her in on the whole emotionless random, amnesiac sex plot line) why can’t you see the problem here?

If this is your attempt at being edgy and reaching out the huge female comic audience out here then I look forward to when this crap collapses around you so someone who gets it can take your place. We’re looking for good stories and great heroes. This just isn’t it.

September 24

Review: Murky Depths #16

Murky Depths is without a doubt one of my favorite magazines. Spawned out of the UK it’s a hybrid blend of graphic strips (don’t call these moody, dark tales comics) and short stories, science fiction, fantasy, horror, articles and interviews. Richard Calder’s Dead Girls takes the cover of issue 16, but we’ll get to that in a bit.

The first tale in this issue is Alan Baxter’s Mirrorwalk. This one has a Lovecraft feel, no elder gods, but two people who stumble upon ancient scrolls of magic find that people just aren’t designed to mess with such things.

Next up is Mecurio D. Rivera’s All Smiles, a short tale that serves up human-alien relations where we’re not being invaded, but they aren’t peaceful, benign critters either, along with a side of sadistic peepshow. Following is Valeria by Ian R. Faulkner. This one is science fiction as well, though it doesn’t need aliens. Instead Faulkner takes readers into the twisted minds of humanity in a techno-noir tale of an abuse victim fighting back.

The highly sexualized build up is a perfect lead in for the next installment of Richard Calder’s Dead Girls series. Calder tells of a pornocracy (where the politics, technology and economy is all driven by sex) where a disease has turned Primavera into a highly infectious vampiric Sex Doll. Along with her sidekick, doll-junkie Ignatz (essentially the person she acts out on) she’s been captured by an ″unknown third party″ who’s looking to torture (and not in the fun way) some answers out of them. The drama so far (nano bot diseases, sexual intrigue and a boy and girl who just want to be left alone and free to love each other) proves Primavera and Ignatz are in over their heads when they didn’t even realize they were ″in″ in the first place. I really hope MD plans to release a collected version of Dead Girls for more in depth reading. * ETA: They are!

Blood Not Boiling by Andrew Roberts is a twisted vampire tale that makes Anne Rice’s choice to have Lestat feed from a tampon in Memnoch the Devil look tame. The title is apt as it confronts sensitive subjects and makes them into something even more bizarre. Teamwork by Jonathan Pinnock is one of those fabulous dark SF stories of space exploration and technology where the reader knows from the beginning something is wrong, but doesn’t really appreciate it until the end. This one’s deserving of a Hitchcock episode.

Michael J. deLuca’s Mowing Them Down also covers familiar horror territory, but since readers won’t guess which land it wanders into I won’t tell. Suffice to say it’s got an aging-Clockwork Orange feel and atmosphere so thick you can smell the cigar smoke. JS Watt’s The Audition ties in very well with previous entries Dead Girls, All Smiles and Teamwork. This SF tale explores the insidious world of movie stars and Hollywood, though. It’s expected bite is no less severe and happily Watts manages to make the pretentious surfer dude actor’s plight a sympathetic journey.

Kevin David Anderson’s Momentum offers one last story piece, a post apoc horror story with carnies and trickery and a solid horror end. The last graphic piece is part two of Lavie Tidhar’s really weird I Dream of Ants. If you’ve ever wondered what a war between the biggest bad guy in European history and the smallest, techno-forged, scariest community bug in the world would be like…well I’m sure you wouldn’t even come close to Lavie’s really bizarre vision.

Issue 16 shows stellar storytelling, imagination and a solid thematic flow, paired with great art is why I always look forward to getting MD in my mail.

September 22

Ramble Review: Shadowflame by Dianne Sylvan

Foreword:

Rambles are like reviews, only longer, much more personal (because they’re stories that I’ve read many times over many years) and they contain a ton of spoilers because part of the idea is talking about every little aspect of the book that strikes me. So be warned if you plan on reading further.

Also, since this is about the second book in a series you might want to read my ramble of the first book, Queen of Shadows.

Onward:

In high school I had a handful of teachers that pushed me to write and enter contests with my stories. I won a few, lost many and loved most of it. Once I left high school I wanted to keep it up but had a hard time finding encouragement (and you know, someone who actually took the time to read my work) and a forum for building writing skills. (Because what you’re taught in high school and even college isn’t often what holds true once you’re on your own trying to start a fiction career.)

I ended up in the fan fiction world, which is where I first read Dianne Sylvan, among others, many terrible, some wonderful. Dianne’s in the latter category. I almost hate bringing this up, except that as Queen of Shadows and Shadowflame are rewrites of these fan fics that I fell in love with a decade ago part of my rambling is comparing the new version to the ones I first fell in love with.

As I said before Shadowflame is the second in the series and it’s this book where the original story veered straight out into full on original territory, which is one reason I liked it. After reading the new official version there’s a big hole in my adoration for this book.

If you’ve read my ramble of Anne Rice’s The Witching Hour you’re familiar with how sometimes I have favorite books, but only reread parts of them. Ever other year or so I reread the history of the Mayfair witches in TWH, but only that part. Shadowflame is going to end up being a reverse of that, where I reread the book, but skip the big part in the middle. With that in mind, let me squee a bit.

I adore Sylvan’s prose. I like literally how she put sentences together, the cadence and voice that her writing has. It’s one of those books where I know the story itself is more common than I usually fall for, but Sylvan has some damned good prose and character building and world building chops that fully distract me from the bits I dislike.

In Shadowflame David and Miranda have been married three months. They’re both struggling in the face of challenges, of course. The vampire world knows that in the time between a mating and the solidification of a Pair’s power they’re vulnerable. And since Miranda is a brand new vampire, not an old powerful one that means if one of the Pair’s enemies can take her out the bond between them will destroy David as well. So they’re facing challenges, still trying to enforce the no-killing-humans policy that makes them unpopular in the Shadow World and to top things off an assassin tried to take Miranda out after a show one night.

Here’s what this book does right. The emotional content is fabulous as Miranda adjusts to not being human anymore. She tries to hold on to her few human friends (funny how we’ve never heard about her family again) but not only does that make them targets, Miranda is also changing as she’s forced to rule in a world that’s super powered, dark and violent.

Miranda also doesn’t just bam overnight become a perfect vampire queen. She’s got a big boost of power compared to other vampires but she does still have to not only learn to use her powers, but learn to manipulate the politics of the Shadow World, which includes proving to the other vampires that she’s just as hard to deal with as the Prime, David.

Also the idea that unlike other Pairs David and Miranda both work toward making Miranda an equal, not just a supporting character addresses the fact that these are immortal creatures who grew up in far more inequal times. And then there’s Prime Deven and his ″Queen″ Jonathan, characters who work well as a couple, as vampire lords and as friends to Miranda and David. (Bear with me, those of you who have read this book, because I’ll get to that.)

The plot too, is largely well-paced with exciting violenty bits well placed between political and relationship drama.

Except…

I’m not a fan or mated romances. There’s no challenge, and in fact they’re even scary. I once wrote half a novella about a couple permanently mated to each other who grew to hate each other quite a bit because I cannot imagine being unable to ever evolve as a person and develop other relationships with people.

With this book Sylvan confronts that idea head on, as she did in the original manuscript. However the execution here just fails. In the original Devin and David have a building, exciting back and forth that ends up in a relationship with Miranda’s blessing (and outright encouragement). In Shadowflame David presents to the reader nothing but bitterness at Devin abandoning him without a word for Jonathan all those years ago. David gives no sign of being tempted by Devin, Devin gives no signs of seducing David. Miranda gives hints that she knows the two are tempted to sleep together, but it comes off as borderline paranoia.

Except it’s forshadowing because out of the blue—with very little sexual tension in the scene—the two fall into bed together and David purposefully cheats on Miranda. Because it is cheating, period, because there is no consent on Miranda’s part. But she knows, because of their magical link.

And if that’s not bad enough when she confronts him Miranda beats the crap out of David. This is presented as a normal reaction, maybe because they’re emotionally amped up vampires, or maybe because it doesn’t matter if Miranda gives David a black eye because he’ll heal in a few minutes. But it’s not okay. As a reader the cheating and the assault is not okay. Sadly the latter is never addressed after the immediate scene in which it occurs.

The cheating however? Well all action, even the attacks by the mysterious would-be assassin stop for weeks ″in book time″ so that David can whine and complain about hurting Miranda and Miranda can coldly pretend she doesn’t care and doesn’t really love David any way. Some emotional reaction is totally expected, but considering David didn’t appear to be on the fence with his relationship with Devin in the first place and he doesn’t try to make anything up to Miranda, there is no ″coverage″ of him rebuilding their relationship, there’s just him longing for her and missing her and him beating himself up over his actions…it’s just too off.

But luckily their magic requires them to make physical contact and David conveniently gets magically poisoned by the assassin (one night when doing the broody Angel moping on a rooftop thing). So Miranda suddenly realizes that for good or ill she’s stuck with him (and really does love him), and David is of course, much less emo once his wife starts sleeping with him again.

Which could be tolerable if the whole aspect of them being soul bound mates and stuck no matter what was brought up again, in a sense that the magic forces them to forgive each other (like via a magical addiction to each other) or in the aspect that Miranda has to face closer to the beginning of the book, that being the fact that they’re not human and therefore have to evolve past human emotions and societal influences. But it’s not. It’s just over, they make up and move on with no real other study of what happened.

And of course it turns out the assassin is a member of a super secret organization of vampire secret agents and the only one with an info dump, I mean, information on her is the man David cheated with, Devin. Who has also been pulling strings to hook David and Miranda up since he’s known all along that they would end up soul-mated. So Miranda and David are forced to forgive Devin too because they wouldn’t be alive or together without him. Supposedly.

Once all the emotional wangst is brushed under the rug by faulty logic they can focus on the person trying to kill them, who is, quite possibly the least developed character in the whole series so far. That bad guy is a one trick pony who has about as much logic behind her actions as David’s cheating, Miranda’s forgiving and Devin’s big reveal. In fact the bad guy’s motivation is directly related to Miranda and David’s major angst. Whether the author meant it or not, it’s real easy to read into this book that people who forgive each other even for nasty behavior manage to get over it and successfully beat their problems, but people who can’t magically let it go are poisoned and driven crazy by it and run around killing people.

It really is like Sylvan continues the great momentum from Queen of Shadow then stops two thirds into the book to drop a bunch of stuff that makes no sense, then realizes there’s a assassination plot to wrap up and not enough room to do it under word count. The book gets better after that huge hiccup, but never quite recovers, sacrificing what could have been a quality bad guy/death plot for all that relationship drama.

Also there’s Cora, who is one of my all time favorite characters. In the original fic (and this one) she finds the strength, despite being raped, abused, held hostage for a decade, being starved and emotionally tormented by a king vampire, to just walk out of her circumstances (barely able to walk in the first place) and find a better life for herself. I so totally identified with Cora and loved seeing how, like Faith and David helped Miranda recover from her madness in the first book, Miranda helped Cora be brave enough to buck her abuse and trauma and become something better.

Only like the assassin plot gets dropped for drama after initially being part of a major event Cora just kinda gets forgotten in the halls of the Haven until her prince arrives and she’s tidily swept off into the ″tied up plots″ pile.

Finally, I want to point out an observation not of this book, but in how this book was received. There’s no doubt that there’s some pretty big things that readers have taken a valid issue with in this book. However it’s important to keep in mind that somewhere along the way Queen of Shadows got billed BY READERS as a paranormal romance, which implies happily ever after. Except that the author and the publisher have sold this series as an urban fantasy for a reason. It is not a romance. The original fic goes places that romance readers will not like (like this book). It is a little unfair that readers are so outraged, not just because of the bits of the book I outlined, but because they put the book in the PNR section despite the author and publisher’s outside information of plotlines to come and now much of the outrage comes from Shadowflame not being a romance book. But it wasn’t in the first place.

While, again, there are very good reasons to not like this book, it’s not fair to make with the angry against the author for not meeting romance readers’ needs when this isn’t a romance book.

So, that’s my ramble on Shadowflame. Have you read it?

Category: GLBT | Comments Off on Ramble Review: Shadowflame by Dianne Sylvan
September 18

I’m so tired of the writer/reviewer divide.

Over at The Book Pushers they’re talking about writers and reviewers. The post author found a rant about rating books on Goodreads. Among other things the ranter said:

1. Positive reviews are okay but never rate books on GoodReads unless it’s 5 stars, even if you didn’t like it that much.

2. Authors are liars.

3. Authors hate GoodReads. And never go there. Except when they do. In which case they get angry.

4. Bad reviews=lack of word of mouth=lack of sales.

5. Even if you rate a book 4 stars authors will look at your profile, see what your average is on books then get mad if you don’t like their book above the average. Then they’ll go through all your books to see which ones you liked at 5 stars and sit around wondering why you liked those and not theirs.

6. If you ever want to be published you should never rate books on GoodReads.

Which earns a great big gigantic WTF from me.

My GoodReads star average is 3.81, which translates to most of the books I read being closer to “I really liked it” than “I liked it”. But for this author that isn’t good enough. Clearly it’s 5 or star or nothing. Sorry babe, but you just aren’t that special. But don’t take it personal, most people aren’t that special because I reserve my 4 stars for books that I think should be required reading. Most books don’t get there. Even the really good fun ones that I recommend to everyone.

And I know a lot of authors who are active on GoodReads, because I know a lot of authors who read period and love sharing the books they adored. They like hosting giveaways, putting up samples, and very rarely do they read (or admit to reading) review of their books. I sometimes go and like all the reviews of my book, without reading them. Heck, sometimes I read them, like last week when I was redoing my website and looking for a small handful of blurbs to accompany certain book pages.

But most authors I know also know reviews are opinions, and they have little to do with us and everything to do with the person writing them. If you can’t stay like steel you don’t read them. Period. You don’t troll reader sites looking for reasons to hate people or be angry.

Plus, bad reviews do not equal lack of sales. Bad reviews can and do sell books. Bad reviews are word of mouth. No reviews = no word of mouth. Apathy is a far worse thing than people hating your work.

I have to ask, what author has the time to dig through the other books a reader has liked or not and compare their own book to it? Who does that? Shouldn’t you, I don’t know, be writing? Or hanging out with your family? Or hell, playing Farmville is more productive and more fun. So why waste time on that? and the truth is, people don’t. Some people might, but the big people, the majority of people, even authorly people just don’t give a flying fuck.

You win some, you lose some. No one likes your book universally and if all you’re getting is 5 star reviews then people are blowing smoke up your ass and don’t care enough to give you an honest opinion. If you don’t get honest feedback you can’t push yourself and GET BETTER.

Finally, Stacia Kane had a point when she blogged about this and pointed out that you have to be careful because once you become established as either a writer or reviewer people start taking your opinion differently. They add more weight to it.

Also, once you’re published you never know where your work will end up. Editors and agents will ask for blurbs and reviews on your behalf, and yeah, it’s human nature that if you’ve trashed a few authors in your travels they might not want to spend their time trying to help sell your book. (By the way the same is true of booksellers and your fellow readers. Spend all your time snarking about them, or being rude and the next time someone asked them about a book they just might say “I haven’t heard of it” or “I didn’t like it/heard it wasn’t great” instead of gushing about it.)

You do have to think about what you’re doing and consider if running a snark blog is worth generating some ill will. Whether you believe in that bad review completely or whether you’re just being petty, or clever. Whether you’re willing to take the fallout if people take your opinion wrong, or it pisses them off, or whether there are better places to vent.

You absolutely can be a reviewer and a writer. Many people have done it. Pick up a copy of Publishers Weekly and thumb to the reviews and look at their list of reviewers. Many of the reviewers over at Monster Librarian are authors too.

It can happen, if it’s something you keep professional and something you consider the ramifications of before hand. Most authors just don’t have the time to do both. Or the desire.

But be careful in implying one cannot be the other, because it’s very close to saying that author shouldn’t be readers and I can think of no better way to kill the art of writing than that.

 

 

Category: Business, My Work | Comments Off on I’m so tired of the writer/reviewer divide.